New Far Right Extremist Group Wreaks Nationwide Havoc
Hide Your Coupons, Hide Your Cosmopolitans-They Motherin' Everybody Out Here.
We’ve seen planes smash into buildings, hotel explosions, subway stabbings, and crude beheadings.
But if you thought you’d seen extremism, think again.
Because there’s a new terrorist in town.
Unfortunately, this new threat isn’t in a far-off land or restricted to the tubes of the internet.
They’re at your local grocery store, little league games, and the church potluck.
They’re full of hate, racism and wish to destroy our way of life.
Who are they?
An offshoot of ISIS? Or MS-13?
Worse.
They call themselves “Moms for Liberty.”
And they’re spreading.
A New “Hate Group” Arises
Thank God the Southern Poverty Law Center is looking out for us without political bias.
According to the advocacy group, Moms for Liberty is an “anti-student inclusion movement that targets any inclusive curriculum that contains discussions of race, discrimination and LGBTQ identities,” as described in their “Year In Hate and Extremism 2022” report.
The annual report adds, “The group hijacks meetings, preventing officials and parents from conducting their normal proceedings.”
Scary stuff.
And it’s not just the SPLC making these claims.
Establishment-run Wikipedia also describes Moms for Liberty as a right-wing political organization on a locked page:
Generally, Moms for Liberty is accused of “harassing” people online and causing scenes at school board meetings.
Leftist media outlets suggest some members may have outright threatened violence and “have ties” to other extremist organizations.
After an Indiana member quoted Hitler in a newsletter, these mama bears found themselves in hot water.
At their convention, another member took the stage to announce her support for the quote and author.
Reality
But most of us know better than to listen to the SPLC or the mainstream narrative.
Who are these extreme moms, really?
Tina Descovich and Tiffany Justice started Moms for Liberty in early 2021 in Florida to call out abusive practices, particularly around CV, such as forced masking and remote learning.
In a short time, Moms for Liberty garnered national support and expanded to 195 chapters in 45 states, with over 100,000 members formed under the slogan “We do not co-parent with the government.”
While school districts dropped mandates and returned to class, Moms for Liberty focused on Critical Race Theory, Social Emotional Learning, and porn manifesting in classrooms nationwide.
We’re familiar with Critical Race Theory, which teaches kids to hate their country and reinforces racist ideals that blacks are forever oppressed while whites have a natural advantage.
But Social Emotional Learning might be a new term for some.
According to the Moms for Liberty website, “SEL is an educational method that focuses on emotions, identities, and ideological persuasion. “
According to National University, proponents of the framework claim to help students manage their emotions and identities, which is important since schools are diverse.
In reality, SEL only reinforces ideas that communities are composed of the oppressed and the oppressors.
As far as “book banning” goes, here’s one of the books they are seeking to ban:
Post Millenial journalist Libby Emmons took to the streets to ask protesters against Moms for Liberty which books should be allowed, and they couldn’t name a single title in this video.
These people have no clue what their protesting.
And that Hitler quote posted in a Moms for Liberty newsletter?
He alone, who owns the youth, gains the future. -Adolf Hitler.
Obviously, the reference illustrates the current state of affairs and how Hitler indoctrinated kids through the Hitler Youth, not in support of old Adolf.
Here’s idiot Gavin Newsom ignoring the quote’s context to defame a group he disagrees with:
So that’s it.
Moms for Liberty isn’t accused of beheading, kidnapping, or doing violence against anyone.
They don’t even throw rocks at protests.
But even if a member outright threatened someone or physically attacked another, is that enough to consider them an extremist group?
Antifa was found to have political connections in the form of funding from Democrat Tom Steyer and George Soros in an undercover Project Veritas video.
However, the SPLC still refuses to call Antifa a terrorist group because doing so “threatens civil liberties.”
The Real Extremists
But we know it’s a political stunt, and the SPLC is a weapon for the establishment.
The SPLC was started in 1971 by attorneys Morris Dees, Joseph J. Levin Jr., and Julian Bond to file lawsuits for people attacked in overt hate crimes and laws and regulations that disfavored southern blacks.
That was all well and good.
But they, like many others, got involved with wokeness.
And the organization rapidly expanded after Donald Trump was elected in 2016.
As “the experts,” the mainstream media can now refer to Moms for Liberty as an extremist group because the SPLC said so.
The SPLC also labeled the Christian advocacy group Family Research Council as a hate group.
Then, in 2012 a man walked into their headquarters with the intention to kill as many people as possible and smear Chic-Fil-A sandwiches on their bodies in a protest against the Christian-based quick-service chain and pro-life advocates in general.
Fortunately, someone disarmed the shooter while taking a non-fatal shot to the arm.
The shooter later admitted he selected the FRC because the SPLC labeled them a hate group.
Check out this opinion article from one of the survivors for details.
The SPLC has also been on the business end of discrimination and sexual harassment cases within their organization.
Threatening Moms
Recently, Moms for Liberty reported an influx of threats since the SPLC released its expert report on Jun 6.
Charming.
And these lunatics are likely looking to uncover personal information on members nationwide, just like the FRC shooter.
Hopefully, Moms for Liberty sues the SPLC into oblivion for defamation.
But could a Moms for Liberty member have threatened someone online or even "have ties” with the Klan?
Of course, we can’t claim any group is 100% innocent or speak for all members with certainty.
But when we zoom out and consider everything at play, between all the government and corporate corruption, it’s more likely this is the establishment’s attempt to silence people they disagree with.
Like the SPLC, MFL was reactionary, born only after extreme government overreach against everyday Americans.
Not because a few Franzia-sipping women suddenly decided to turn their book club into Klanned Karenhood, Whine Kampf, or, my favorite, the Mini-Van Taliban.
I’ll give credit where it’s due, and those are pretty clever names.
But the only extremists here are the SPLC and the establishment.
Great and informing article!